3779 Shares

Vegetarians! Doing research Paper on how Vegetarianism is *healthier* than any other diet. Have info to share?

Vegetarians! Doing research Paper on how Vegetarianism is *healthier* than any other diet. Have info to share? Topic: Shared term papers
June 20, 2019 / By Brenna
Question: Hi Vegetarians! Thanks for stopping in! I've been a veggie for a year now, and am loving it. I'm now writing a research term paper on vegetarianism. I want to prove that being a vegetarian is a healthier diet than any other (especially one containing any animal ingredients). Are there any beneficial websites, books, articles, or so on, that you would recommend I look into for this project? I need info ASAP. Thanks much!
Best Answer

Best Answers: Vegetarians! Doing research Paper on how Vegetarianism is *healthier* than any other diet. Have info to share?

Alexia Alexia | 1 day ago
Well I started loosing weight when I went veg. & my skin cleared up a whole lot. :) good luck on your paper! peta/peta2.com are very good websites to use.
👍 190 | 👎 1
Did you like the answer? Vegetarians! Doing research Paper on how Vegetarianism is *healthier* than any other diet. Have info to share? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: Shared term papers


Alexia Originally Answered: Vegetarians! Doing research Paper on how Vegetarianism is *healthier* than any other diet. Have info to share?
Well I started loosing weight when I went veg. & my skin cleared up a whole lot. :) good luck on your paper! peta/peta2.com are very good websites to use.

Tybalt Tybalt
Hi, I'm happy to help! Not too sure about books, although I know some great vegetarian websites. The Vegetarian Society's website is really good for recipes, nutritional advice, and general information: http://www.vegsoc.org/ Reasons to go vegetarian, the myths and stereotypes, & common questions: http://www.vegsoc.org/info/goingveg.html The Vegetarian & Vegan Foundation is a website I found recently. I think it's brilliant, the information is very clear and well presented: http://www.vegetarian.org.uk/ Here is some general information on vegetarian diets: http://www.animal-lib.org.au/subjects/subjects/vegetarianism.htm ..and: http://www.vegetarian-nutrition.info/ The Vegetarian Society's Nutrition Sheet: http://www.vegsoc.org/health/ Why it's green to go vegetarian: http://www.vegsoc.org/vegweek/reasons.html The many health benefits of a vegetarian diet: http://www.vegetarian-nutrition.info/updates/vegetarian_diets_health_benefits.php I hope this helps you, best of luck with your project! :-)
👍 80 | 👎 -1

Rickey Rickey
Here you go. Look up American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada; J Am Diet Assoc 2003 vol.103: pp. 748-765. Davis, Brenda. Cutting Edge Vegetarian Nutrition. Univ or Ariz Program in Integrative Medicine Nutrition and Health Conference. 2005. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2003. vol 103: pp. 771-775. Hope this helps you out.
👍 80 | 👎 -3

Merle Merle
First - and that i'm announcing this as a vegan - being vegetarian or vegan isn't unavoidably fit; a veg*n eating habitual could be somewhat healthful or very risky or everywhere in between, as can a eating habitual that is composed of meat. you would be do greater suited to place in writing a paper demonstrating and proving that a veg*n eating habitual could be very healthful, and not lacking in any nutrients, than to attempt and instruct this is fit than the different, Secondly, you have been given some incorrect information here. sort 2 diabetes isn't brought about by employing eating habitual, and there at the instant are not any particular meals, which includes meat, that reason or make contributions to it. And meat isn't related to 'many styles of maximum cancers'. A eating habitual intense in crimson and processed meats is a properly-recognized threat element for colorectal cancers and is known to be a plausible threat element for abdomen maximum cancers, and a eating habitual intense in meat and fat would be a plausible threat element for pancreatic maximum cancers. A eating habitual intense in dairy products is known to be a plausible threat element for prostate maximum cancers. be conscious the words 'intense', 'plausible' and 'would'; and be attentive to that a threat element isn't a reason. and that's quite plenty it for any familiar connection between animal products and the 2 hundred+ styles of maximum cancers. Unsubstantiated claims for the well being reward of veg*nism in basic terms make us all look stupid.
👍 80 | 👎 -5

Jonty Jonty
General health: http://www.goveg.com/healthConcerns.asp http://www.pcrm.org/health/veginfo/vsk/v... http://www.chooseveg.com/vegan-health.as... (navigate by clicking on the forward arrow at the bottom. Site includes references!) Heart diease: http://www.goveg.com/heartdisease.asp Cancer: http://www.goveg.com/cancer.asp Diabetes: http://www.goveg.com/diabetes.asp The American Dietetic Association is the world's largest organization of food and nutrition professionals. It says: "Vegetarians have been reported to have lower body mass indices than nonvegetarians, as well as lower rates of death from ischemic heart disease; vegetarians also show lower blood cholesterol levels; lower blood pressure; and lower rates of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and prostate and colon cancer." http://www.eatright.org/cps/rde/xchg/ada/hs.xsl/advocacy_933_ENU_HTML.htm Books: The China Study: Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss and Long Term Health (T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D.) The Food Revolution: How Your Diet Can Help Save Your Life and The World (John Robbins) Diet for a New America: How Your Food Choices Affect Your Health, Happiness and the Future of Life on Earth (John Robbins) Good luck!!
👍 80 | 👎 -7

Jonty Originally Answered: I need help with my research paper?
- but another bad thing nuclear power has brought upon us. If anything, the situation shows how safe nuclear power is. Consider that forty year old plants were hit with an earthquake five times the strength they were designed for and yet they still shut down safely. The generators came on like they were supposed to when grid power was cut. Then the tsunami hit and the generators were wiped out. However, the battery backup still worked for the designed eight hours. The problem happened when no new generators could be put in. Even so the problems have been minimal--media scare mongering for ratings not withstanding. Here is an informative article describing the situation: http://bravenewclimate.com/2011/03/13/fu... And here is where you find current, factual status information: http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsun... And a slide presentation that describes the effects: http://www.slideshare.net/iaea/7th-april... And here is a chart that helps make sense of the numbers: http://www.xkcd.com/radiation/ And before you come down on nuclear energy, take a look at coal. In the U.S. 20 to 60 coal miners die each year compared to zero nuclear power plant workers. Pollution from coal power plants kill over 20,000 people in the U.S. annually compared to about 100 people killed world-wide from nuclear power over the last forty years. The only thing coal has going for it is that it doesn't have "nuclear" in the wording so therefore it must be safe. It seems that most people have learned about nuclear energy from sci-fi B movies rather than from studying the science. http://frankwarner.typepad.com/free_frank_warner/2006/01/us_coal_mining_.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5174391/ns/us_news-environment/ And don't think that coal power plants are radiation-free: http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/tenorm/coalandcoalash.html http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste

If you have your own answer to the question shared term papers, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.