5830 Shares

What is Hillary Clinton's stand on Abortion and the Death penalty?

What is Hillary Clinton's stand on Abortion and the Death penalty? Topic: A good research paper on the death penalty
July 20, 2019 / By Sloane
Question: i'm doing a research paper on her and where she stands with certain policies. Can you please help me out with some good websites.
Best Answer

Best Answers: What is Hillary Clinton's stand on Abortion and the Death penalty?

Pollie Pollie | 10 days ago
All for abortion and against the death penalty but if it will help with their votes, it can change tomorrow.
👍 288 | 👎 10
Did you like the answer? What is Hillary Clinton's stand on Abortion and the Death penalty? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: A good research paper on the death penalty


Pollie Originally Answered: What is Hillary Clinton's stand on Abortion and the Death penalty?
All for abortion and against the death penalty but if it will help with their votes, it can change tomorrow.
Pollie Originally Answered: What is Hillary Clinton's stand on Abortion and the Death penalty?
She wants to expand programs to help pregnant women and girls who may be considering abortion. That is a proven way to reduce the number of abortions. It worked for Giuliani in NYC, for example. She says she is not "pro abortion" but is "pro choice" because we must allow women the unfortunate option of abortion to prevent back alley abortions which lead to infection and death. She said in the debates that she supports the death penalty for the most heinous of crimes. Hillary's website explains some of her positions, but your best source now may be the transcripts of the Democratic debates. You can google and download them, then search for the words "death penalty" and "abortion." Another good source would be the Sunday talk shows. She has appeared on all of them; Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, Meet the Press, This Week with George Stephanopolous, Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer and Face the Nation. Some of the websites for those shows have transcripts.

Matty Matty
She wants to expand programs to help pregnant women and girls who may be considering abortion. That is a proven way to reduce the number of abortions. It worked for Giuliani in NYC, for example. She says she is not "pro abortion" but is "pro choice" because we must allow women the unfortunate option of abortion to prevent back alley abortions which lead to infection and death. She said in the debates that she supports the death penalty for the most heinous of crimes. Hillary's website explains some of her positions, but your best source now may be the transcripts of the Democratic debates. You can google and download them, then search for the words "death penalty" and "abortion." Another good source would be the Sunday talk shows. She has appeared on all of them; Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, Meet the Press, This Week with George Stephanopolous, Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer and Face the Nation. Some of the websites for those shows have transcripts.
👍 120 | 👎 4

Matty Originally Answered: Similes or Metaphors for Death penalty?
The death penalty is the system whose worst mistakes are irreversible. It buries its worst mistakes. For the worst crimes, life without parole is better, for many reasons. I’m against capital punishment not because of sympathy for criminals but because it doesn’t reduce crime, prolongs the anguish of families of murder victims, costs a whole lot more than life in prison, and, worst of all, risks executions of innocent people. The worst thing about it. Errors: The system can make tragic mistakes. As of now, 143 wrongly convicted people on death row have been exonerated. We’ll never know for sure how many people have been executed for crimes they didn’t commit. DNA is rarely available in homicides, often irrelevant and can’t guarantee we won’t execute innocent people. Keeping killers off the streets for good: Life without parole, on the books in most states, also prevents reoffending. It means what it says, and spending the rest of your life locked up, knowing you’ll never be free, is no picnic. Two big advantages: -an innocent person serving life can be released from prison -life without parole costs less than capital punishment Costs, a big surprise to many people: Study after study has found that capital punishment is much more expensive than life in prison. The process is much more complex than for any other kind of criminal case. The largest costs come at the pre-trial and trial stages. These apply whether or not the defendant is convicted, let alone sentenced to death. Crime reduction (deterrence): Homicide rates for states that use capital punishment are consistently higher than for those that don’t. The most recent FBI data confirms this. For people without a conscience, fear of being caught is the best deterrent. Capital punishment is no more effective in deterring others than life sentences. Who gets it: Capital punishment magnifies social and economic inequalities. It isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to people with money. Practically everyone sentenced to death had to rely on an overworked public defender. Victims: People assume that families of murder victims want capital punishment to be imposed. It isn't necessarily so. Some are against it on moral grounds. But even families who have supported it in principle have testified to the protracted and unavoidable damage that capital punishment process does to families like theirs and that life without parole is an appropriate alternative. Capital punishment comes down to retribution or revenge- the only plausible reasons to support it.
Matty Originally Answered: Similes or Metaphors for Death penalty?
I believe that there should be a death penalty since paying to keep people in prison only makes them 10 times worse by the time they get out, but I also believe we should have a legitimate rehabilitation program for anyone who can be rehabilitated. Something like a "3 strikes your out" system. Presently, we release convicted felons back into the community after they have served their time but prison only turns them into worse monsters. Sex offenders are required to register in a public database making it impossible for them to find work or a place to live. If they are good enough to be released back into society then we should not shoot them in the foot by exposing their records so they have no other choice but to commit more crime to go back to jail. If we have a legitimate rehabilitation system then we should be doing everything possible to help rehabilitated prisoners to be successful in society. Anybody who cannot be rehabilitated and continues to repeat criminal offenses should just be put to death. It only creates a larger burden on society by releasing monsters from prison for all of society to deal with. Prisons should not be torture chambers they should be agencies of rehabilitation. Evil does not teach a person to be good. There are ways to help people to change their lives that are effective. Instead of wasting all of these billions of dollars to keep people locked up in torture chambers it seems it would be a better use of money to give them hope to change their lives by instead offering them educational or vocational opportunities. If they continue to repeat crimes then just put them to death; they cannot be helped. It is inhumane to release a convict into society and expect him to do better when everything about our society is designed to hold them back. Many first time offenders get put into the prison system with very bad criminals and they have to learn to be evil themselves in order to survive. Our prison system is not a rehabilitation system. It is a monster making torture system. We have to start by changing the design of the prison systems to make them into true places of rehabilitation, opportunity for betterment, and education.

If you have your own answer to the question a good research paper on the death penalty, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.