4734 Shares

How do we educate ourselves about the importance of recycling?

How do we educate ourselves about the importance of recycling? Topic: Essay on environment pollution
April 26, 2019 / By Ainsley
Question: What are some good points on recycling. I'm writing an essay and I need to present a detailed plan on why It is important to recycle and one of my reasons is to educate yourself on the importance of recycling but how?
Best Answer

Best Answers: How do we educate ourselves about the importance of recycling?

Toney Toney | 3 days ago
Hi, The Importance of Recycling The recycling of materials is an extremely crucial process towards the improvement of the condition of our planet. However, not everyone is motivated to recycle; why is this? I believe if everyone was more educated on the immense benefits recycling has to offer, more people would be inclined to actively recycle. The advantages of recycling will be significantly larger if a higher percentage of people take the time to recycle their goods. Those who understand these benefits should advocate for the expansion of recycling means in order to help sustain our planet and improve our environment. Mankind should attempt to attain the goal of “zero waste”. There are many steps one can take in order to reduce our negative impact on our Earth. Our planet and environment are in dire need of protection from pollution and other harmful entities. More information here: http://www.oppapers.com/essays/Importance-Of-Recycling/653101
👍 114 | 👎 3
Did you like the answer? How do we educate ourselves about the importance of recycling? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: Essay on environment pollution


Toney Originally Answered: Someone please educate me about Ron Paul?
Let me focus on the fundamental campaign issue that Dr. Paul is supporting. That is, the reestablishment of the Constitution. All of the things that he states that he will or won’t do are based within the Constitution. So too with the positions that he has taken over his 30 years of public life all are based on the Constitution. By way of personal truth, as with Dr. Paul, I’m a veteran and am only a few years younger than he is and I supported him when he first ran for President in 1988 and I have a past State Chair for the Libertarian Party in my State. During the recent caucuses in my State I was selected to speak for Dr. Paul in the largest caucus in the State and was prepared to do so if he had not come himself. That said, no other candidate (of any political party) will base their campaign on the Constitution. Such a stance is what the President takes an oath to do, that is, “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” If any presidential candidate by word or act negates that oath they are lying to the voters of the country. I suggest that Dr. Ron Paul is the only candidate dedicated to that oath. Such a stance defines his approach to the issues which all can be found on his Web site or the link to the “Liberty Caucus” where 30 years of speeches consistently define his positions. He has not wavered, flip-flopped, or had an epiphany, or Johnny-come-lately to the constitution throughout those 30 years. No other candidate can truthfully make such a claim. To correct the misstatements of a few of his positions I’ll offer the following: His stance on Iraq: Here we have invaded a recognized national country and have done so without a congressional declaration of war. Clearly this is unconstitutional and our military should be redeployed from such a action. This does not mean that he doesn’t recognize the danger of terrorists. In fact he voted for the military effort to seek the terrorists which caused the 11 September 2001 disaster. This included the sending of military to both Afghanistan and Pakistan neither of these actions were unconstitutional. Both necessitated the permission of the countries in question. Beyond this he has advocated a different Constitutional method of going after the terrorists, that is, to have Congressional issued Letters of Margue and Reprisal (re: Constitution – Article I, Section 8, Clause 11) which provides a military force to seek and capture those named in the Letters. We last used such a procedure in the War of 1812. We have military stationed in 400 installations in 130 countries world wide and for this there is no constitutional justification and it is certainly against the desires of the Founders. In a question asked during the ABC Debate about fixing the high cost of medical procedures he alone made the point that whatever was done would have no merit if first the monetary system was not returned to Constitutional mandates and that position is being based on a hard money monetary system. He made the point that all the world currencies have inflated against the cost of crude oil (the United States dollar performing the worse) and that is due to governments over printing the money supply. Only gold has remained flat relative to the cost of crude oil. Although he didn’t mention it studies have demonstrated that gold has remained relatively flat against all basic commodities for a period exceeding 500 years. Further, when ask how they the candidates (as president) would make their decisions, all of the candidates began to address what they would do to various issues. This really meant nothing since issues (and the solutions to them) continually change. Only Dr. Paul gave a meaningful answer by stating that the principles embedded within the Constitution would guide all of his decision making. He has also stated that he would remove all of the income taxes. This apparently puts both questioners and other candidates into a panic where they either scoff or sneer by asking, “then how would the government run.” This demonstrates their own historical ignorance of the fact that prior to 1914 we never had an income tax (except for a short period from the early 1860s to the mid 1870s) and got along fine. Consider what it would mean to have the income tax removed. First this would force the federal government to return to doing only those things arising from the delegated powers within the constitution. Secondly the wage earner purchasing power would dramatically increase because there would no longer be any federal income tax withdrawal. Secondly business income taxes would also disappear which through competition would force prices to drop (note: when you purchase that new car, about 40% is hidden income taxes that you pay). Both of these things would dramatically increase consumer purchasing power and the demand for product as well as increase savings. This would increase production and the requirement for more workers and for business expansion. With this would be an increased need for legal immigrants and for investment capital which would include significant increase of foreign capital coming to this country where the taxes would be beneficial to investment. By instituting a law when invested foreign capital profits would have to have a minimum of 90% remain within the country all of this growth would be compounded. The point is, that by basing his approach on Constitutional foundations, Representative Dr. Ron Paul is unique within the entire slate of presidential candidates. For you who are younger his approach means a world in which your individual rights are recognized and your control over your own life will increase many fold. All just because he remains true to the Constitution. This is only a short look at his proposals.
Toney Originally Answered: Someone please educate me about Ron Paul?
His platform: -end the war in iraq (phased redeployment, while securing stability in the country as we bring our troops home) -lower taxes for middle class families by restraining government spending -returning to fiscal responsibility & balance the budget -secure borders & end amnesty for illegals -reform health care making it affordable, reliable & available -ensure that all veterans receive the benefits they have earned & the assistance they need. -strengthen national defense & intelligence to counter terrorism -repeal the patriot act -end unfair trade agreements like NAFTA (an estimated 40 million Americans will loose their jobs because of this agreement) -handle global situations through diplomacy -end corporate welfare
Toney Originally Answered: Someone please educate me about Ron Paul?
Go to Votesmart.org and you can see his voting record in black and white. That's the only thing that matters in a candidate. Forget what everyone says, go see what he's done.

Rayner Rayner
yeah, too undesirable my community would not we've recycling boxes on the homestead for plastic, aluminum, pop and plastic luggage extraordinarily. unsure what to do with the glass. additionally i'm paying for the greater effective mild bulbs. hubby won't get the assumption of that nevertheless. i'm additionally washing on chilly temp, putting some outfits to dry, preserving temp up in summer time and down in wintry climate. searching for greater recommendations nevertheless.
👍 40 | 👎 -3

Rayner Originally Answered: DO people not educate themselves?
I have to wonder about these people too. When I was pregnant with my first baby, we took a child birth education class at the hospital where I was going to deliver. My ob/gyn told me about it. I imagine the hospital where I delivered my boys isn't the ONLY one that offers this. It was completely free...as was the breastfeeding class, the First Year of Life class, and the other 10 or 15 classes they offered. Why aren't people's doctors telling them about this?? I also read read read (books, magazines, articles online), asked friends/family members baby questions, etc. I really don't understand how people can be so...well, DUMB when it comes to babies. I still say the most ridiculous question I ever answered was several weeks ago. A man was writing becuase his 17 month old daughter had a high-grade fever, was screaming uncontrollably, and had been walking around in circles all day. WTF?? The truly sad thing is that it was a legitimate question.
Rayner Originally Answered: DO people not educate themselves?
I agree for the most part. I just wish you hadn't been so harsh. It does drive me crazy when I see things on here and I'm thinking they either don't read at all or they're not even seeing a doctor. A lot of times I think people aren't taking their child to well child check when they ask their questions here too. That said, my sister in law is so stubborn that she will not take advice from anyone nor will she read a book. She insists on learning everything herself the hard way. It really sucks more for her and I wish she would just crack open a parenting book but it's her choice. Despite what would appear to be very poor parenting in both her and many people on here, I still assume most parents are doing the best they can and that's the best they can do. We all fall short somewhere.

If you have your own answer to the question essay on environment pollution, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.