Identify the Logical Fallacy in each sentence?

Identify the Logical Fallacy in each sentence? Topic: How to write a dr. note for work
June 26, 2019 / By Elgar
Question: 1. Education cannot prepare men and women for marriage. To try to educate them for marriage is like trying to teach them to swim without letting them go into the water. It cannot be done. 2. To allow the press to keep their sources confidential is very advantageous to the country, since it is highly conducive to the interests of the larger community that private individuals should have the privilege of providing information to the press without being identified. 3. "If we pass laws against fully automatic weapons, then it won't be long before we pass laws on all weapons, and then we will begin to restrict other rights, and finally we will end up living in a communist state. Thus, we should not ban fully automatic weapons." 4. How can you take Dr. Bier seriously when he rides a motor scooter to work? 5. Writing is just like exercise. If you lift weights three or four times a week, you’ll get muscles. If you write three or four times a week, you’ll produce a best-seller. 6. The Iraqi people are grateful for the U.S. military presence. My brother’s a soldier, and he told me so. 7. After the nuclear power plant began operations in our area, my dog started going bald. That plant contaminated my dog. 8. Some say that auto insurance rates need to be more strictly regulated, but how strict are regulations on health insurance? 9. “You think the problem of AIDS in Africa is serious, well, let me tell you about the problem of overpopulation there”. 10. "Satanist Quarterly reports that 87% of Americans are atheists. Therefore, there is no god."
Best Answer

Best Answers: Identify the Logical Fallacy in each sentence?

Catigern Catigern | 9 days ago
I'll note what I see; you'll have to determine the exact name of the fallacy that describes what I've seen: 1 and 5 look like potentially faulty analogies. In 2, the premise and the conclusion are saying the exact same thing, so that would appear to be begging the question. 3 seems to be a slippery slope. 4 seems to be an ad hominem. 6 could be an appeal to authority or it could be a hasty generalization. 7 seems to be a confusion of correlation with causation. 8 and 9 seem to be red herrings, although it's possible that you could be more specific. 10 appears to be arguing from obviously false premises, but this could be considered an appeal to authority too.
👍 166 | 👎 9
Did you like the answer? Identify the Logical Fallacy in each sentence? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: How to write a dr. note for work

Catigern Originally Answered: Can someone give me a sentence for Fallacy which means.?
People used to think that the Earth was flat. The ancient civilizations thought that there were many gods & goddesses. The ancient civilizations thought there were many types of monsters, roaming the Earth (witches, vampires, werewolves, centaurs, dragons, etc.). The moon was made out of Swiss cheese. Step on a crack, you'll break your mother's back. You'll have bad luck if a black cat crosses your path. These are a few example of the types of fallacies that people used to believe in.
Catigern Originally Answered: Can someone give me a sentence for Fallacy which means.?
The word 'fallacy' is usually used in reference to 'old wives tales'. When I was a youngster (YEARS ago) if I had a nasty bump on my head my mother would put butter on it. In this case, the idea that butter would ease a bump would nowadays be considered a fallacy.

Allysdair Allysdair
1. Education about marriage can give them an idea about it and a way to avoid arguments or help in keeping a connection. Just like telling a person how to move your legs and arms in water can be very helpful before you go into the water. It may not save a marriage, but it gives the people involved a head start. 2. At the same time, the confidential parties might be threatening national security or could be terrorists. It is not without it's flaws. 3. No. Full automatic weapons are overkill. But just because 1 law is passed against something, that doesn't mean it'll go farther than that. If it does, people will need to stop it. Hand guns for protection are good enough. Automatics are not needed except in war. 4. How would that reflect on the doctor's work? Maybe he's just trying to be green and not flaunt his success? It seems to me that such a type of humility is a positive sign, not a negative one. 5. Logical Fallacy right here. And a possible Red Herring. It takes imagination and creativity to write a good story. It takes little creativity to lift weights (though endurance and boredom of repeating the same motions after a while is another matter). 6. The brother could be lying, and the Iraqis might very well not like their country being beaten up. 7. It is the radiation, or it could another thing, like a disease. The plant itself isn't by default, the problem. Much more so if the plant is more than a few miles away. 8. The fallacy here is citing health insurance rates as a reason why auto insurance rates shouldn't be regulated more. Just because one isn't as strictly regulated, it doesn't mean other insurance rates shouldn't be regulated more strictly. 9. Overpopulation and AIDS are both a consequence of sex. Birth control, condoms and other preventative measures are needed to prevent overpopulation and AIDS spreading. Both are serious and both are an enormous problem. The fallacy is saying one isn't serious, but the other is when it's both that are serious. 10. Not only is that statistic false, but there is no proof of a God existing or not. The majority don't control what reality is. There's multiple fallacies with this last one.
👍 60 | 👎 1

Terra Terra
Evolution and creationism are actually not equals. nor is scientific and nor is in basic terms religious. although, creationism would not would desire to be falsified because it relatively is at that is middle a spiritual view. in addition evolution would not have sufficient evidence to scientifically with out faith teach that is case so open to being falsified as extra evidence is obtainable in. logic is beside the point subsequently as that is no longer a yardstick of any style yet merely a gadget utilised to comprehend something no longer teach something. logic is itself beset with paradoxes so may well be confounded. ideally neither view is substantial to scientific or religious progression so the little ones could merely be reported the two and allowed to get on with extra substantial issues. Its merely because of the fact extremist atheists have been making it a factor to evangelise evolution as anti-religious sentiment that the creationist stream got here approximately. in the top that is plausible the two are precise and species have been positioned on earth and stepped forward from there.
👍 52 | 👎 -7

Terra Originally Answered: Can someone help me spot a fallacy??
In question 1, in his answer he never says whether he's planning to make a change, nor does he discuss why his present plan would not lead to a catastrophe (which is the focus of the question). In question 2, he talks about reactions to Dr. X. Streamist's idea, not to his own plan. In question 3, he talks about the view of an elderly gentleman he met, not about his own plan So, essentially, he avoids ever answering any of the questions about his own policies. These are typical ways that politicians use to sound good but avoid responding to the question they were actually asked.

If you have your own answer to the question how to write a dr. note for work, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.